<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Governance, Risk Management, Compliance (pt. 1): Form over Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloginfosec.com/2008/09/08/governance-risk-management-compliance-pt-1-form-over-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2008/09/08/governance-risk-management-compliance-pt-1-form-over-content/</link>
	<description>An Information Security Magazine in a Blog Format</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2008/09/08/governance-risk-management-compliance-pt-1-form-over-content/comment-page-1/#comment-17189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloginfosec.com/?p=545#comment-17189</guid>
		<description>I agree with your article and have some additional thoughts.  I think the GRC exercise does quickly become form over substance because many companies try to lead with a technology solution and then design their processes to support that solution.  First and foremost, GRC processes should be designed to support the business and ultimately be integrated with decision-making processes within the business.  Then, technology should be employed to streamline the processes to create additional efficiencies.  While most folks are focusing on converging the G, R &amp; C, they are leaving out the most important element - the B (the business that is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your article and have some additional thoughts.  I think the GRC exercise does quickly become form over substance because many companies try to lead with a technology solution and then design their processes to support that solution.  First and foremost, GRC processes should be designed to support the business and ultimately be integrated with decision-making processes within the business.  Then, technology should be employed to streamline the processes to create additional efficiencies.  While most folks are focusing on converging the G, R &amp; C, they are leaving out the most important element &#8211; the B (the business that is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

