Comments on: Another Stab at a Centralized Breach Repository http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/08/27/another-stab-at-a-centralized-breach-repository/ An Information Security Magazine in a Blog Format Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Adam http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/08/27/another-stab-at-a-centralized-breach-repository/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Adam Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:04:14 +0000 http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/08/27/another-stab-at-a-centralized-breach-repository/#comment-119 For clarity, I don't think there was any disagreement. I said "exclusive" access. I don't think that we should send our data to an agency, who would massage it and give us access to the summaries they see fit to create. I stand by that, and don't think Chris disagrees with me. Also, I don't recall Lords arguing against individual notice, only for a central report. For clarity, I don’t think there was any disagreement. I said “exclusive” access. I don’t think that we should send our data to an agency, who would massage it and give us access to the summaries they see fit to create. I stand by that, and don’t think Chris disagrees with me.

Also, I don’t recall Lords arguing against individual notice, only for a central report.

]]>