<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blame it on Security: Vista Home Edition Cannot Run in Virtualization Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/02/23/blame-it-on-security-vista-home-edition-cannot-run-in-virtualization-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/02/23/blame-it-on-security-vista-home-edition-cannot-run-in-virtualization-software/</link>
	<description>An Information Security Magazine in a Blog Format</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OsamaS</title>
		<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/02/23/blame-it-on-security-vista-home-edition-cannot-run-in-virtualization-software/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>OsamaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 03:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/02/23/blame-it-on-security-vista-home-edition-cannot-run-in-virtualization-software/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>They better have stop Vista altogether, after all it could pose a security risk.
The risk here seems to be related to DRM issues. A risk for MS.
MS doesn&#039;t really care about the risks the users have to take, these are just an opportunity to sell their own mediocre security technologies and of course selling the new OS versions that do have &quot;improved&quot; security.
This stinks, and I doubt buy the MS claims at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They better have stop Vista altogether, after all it could pose a security risk.<br />
The risk here seems to be related to DRM issues. A risk for MS.<br />
MS doesn&#8217;t really care about the risks the users have to take, these are just an opportunity to sell their own mediocre security technologies and of course selling the new OS versions that do have &#8220;improved&#8221; security.<br />
This stinks, and I doubt buy the MS claims at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

