<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FUD Theater: Microsoft, Vista, Vendors and the Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/01/11/fud-theater-microsoft-vista-vendors-and-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/01/11/fud-theater-microsoft-vista-vendors-and-the-media/</link>
	<description>An Information Security Magazine in a Blog Format</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:01:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bloginfosec.com &#187; FUD: Kaspersky Claims Vista May Be Less Secure Then XP</title>
		<link>http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/01/11/fud-theater-microsoft-vista-vendors-and-the-media/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>bloginfosec.com &#187; FUD: Kaspersky Claims Vista May Be Less Secure Then XP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloginfosec.com/2007/01/11/fud-theater-microsoft-vista-vendors-and-the-media/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] is 100% foolproof, even Microsoft admits that. It&#8217;s my opinion that Vista is more secure out of the box, even with UAC turned off, than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is 100% foolproof, even Microsoft admits that. It&#8217;s my opinion that Vista is more secure out of the box, even with UAC turned off, than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

