When journalists publicize an IP address and ask for more information, it’s almost like asking someone to break the law. There is only so much information one can get via the internet protocols and google. After that, the host itself must be interrogated.
Also, this assumes that the IP address is actually the one owned (legally) by the perpetrator. What if someone hopped on someone else’s wireless connection?
Go ahead: I double dog dare you….
When journalists publicize an IP address and ask for more information, it’s almost like asking someone to break the law. There is only so much information one can get via the internet protocols and google. After that, the host itself must be interrogated.
Also, this assumes that the IP address is actually the one owned (legally) by the perpetrator. What if someone hopped on someone else’s wireless connection?
Shame on Computerworld….
Popularity: 3%